21 June 2010

  1. Front Page
  2. Applications
  3. Development
  4. Devices
  5. Announcements
  6. Download issue

Other Issues

  1. 20 May 2013
  2. 6 May 2013
  3. 29 April 2013
  4. 22 April 2013
  5. 8 April 2013
  6. 25 March 2013
  7. 18 March 2013
  8. 11 March 2013
  9. 4 March 2013
  10. 18 February 2013
  11. 4 February 2013
  12. 28 January 2013
  13. 21 January 2013
  14. 14 January 2013
  15. 7 January 2013
  16. 17 December 2012
  17. 3 December 2012
  18. 26 November 2012
  19. 12 November 2012
  20. 29 October 2012
  21. 22 October 2012
  22. 15 October 2012
  23. 8 October 2012
  24. 1 October 2012
  25. 24 September 2012
  26. 17 September 2012
  27. 10 September 2012
  28. 3 September 2012
  29. 27 August 2012
  30. 20 August 2012
  31. 13 August 2012
  32. 6 August 2012
  33. 30 July 2012
  34. 23 July 2012
  35. 16 July 2012
  36. 9 July 2012
  37. 2 July 2012
  38. 25 June 2012
  39. 18 June 2012
  40. 11 June 2012
  41. 4 June 2012
  42. 28 May 2012
  43. 21 May 2012
  44. 14 May 2012
  45. 7 May 2012
  46. 30 April 2012
  47. 23 April 2012
  48. 16 April 2012
  49. 9 April 2012
  50. 2 April 2012
  51. 26 March 2012
  52. 19 March 2012
  53. 12 March 2012
  54. 5 March 2012
  55. 27 February 2012
  56. 20 February 2012
  57. 13 February 2012
  58. 6 February 2012
  59. 30 January 2012
  60. 23 January 2012
  61. 16 January 2012
  62. 9 January 2012
  63. 2 January 2012
  64. 19 December 2011
  65. 12 December 2011
  66. 5 December 2011
  67. 28 November 2011
  68. 21 November 2011
  69. 14 November 2011
  70. 7 November 2011
  71. 31 October 2011
  72. 24 October 2011
  73. 17 October 2011
  74. 10 October 2011
  75. 3 October 2011
  76. 26 September 2011
  77. 19 September 2011
  78. 12 September 2011
  79. 5 September 2011
  80. 29 August 2011
  81. 22 August 2011
  82. 15 August 2011
  83. 8 August 2011
  84. 1 August 2011
  85. 25 July 2011
  86. 18 July 2011
  87. 11 July 2011
  88. 4 July 2011
  89. 27 June 2011
  90. 20 June 2011
  91. 13 June 2011
  92. 6 June 2011
  93. 30 May 2011
  94. 23 May 2011
  95. 16 May 2011
  96. 9 May 2011
  97. 2 May 2011
  98. 25 April 2011
  99. 18 April 2011
  100. 11 April 2011
  101. 4 April 2011
  102. 28 March 2011
  103. 21 March 2011
  104. 14 March 2011
  105. 7 March 2011
  106. 28 February 2011
  107. 21 February 2011
  108. 14 February 2011
  109. 7 February 2011
  110. 31 January 2011
  111. 24 January 2011
  112. 17 January 2011
  113. 10 January 2011
  114. 3 January 2011
  115. 20 December 2010
  116. 13 December 2010
  117. 6 December 2010
  118. 29 November 2010
  119. 22 November 2010
  120. 15 November 2010
  121. 8 November 2010
  122. 1 November 2010
  123. 25 October 2010
  124. 18 October 2010
  125. 11 October 2010
  126. 4 October 2010
  127. 27 September 2010
  128. 20 September 2010
  129. 13 September 2010
  130. 6 September 2010
  131. 30 August 2010
  132. 23 August 2010
  133. 16 August 2010
  134. 9 August 2010
  135. 2 August 2010
  136. 26 July 2010
  137. 19 July 2010
  138. 12 July 2010
  139. 5 July 2010
  140. 28 June 2010
  141. 14 June 2010
  142. 7 June 2010
  143. 31 May 2010
  144. 24 May 2010
  145. 17 May 2010
  146. 10 May 2010
  147. 3 May 2010
  148. 26 April 2010
  149. 19 April 2010
  150. 12 April 2010
  151. 5 April 2010
  152. 29 March 2010
  153. 22 March 2010
  154. 15 March 2010
  155. 8 March 2010
  156. 1 March 2010
  157. 22 February 2010
  158. 15 February 2010
  159. 8 February 2010
  160. 1 February 2010

Development

Nokia opening Ovi Store up to individuals rather than just VAT-registered companies?

A small quote on the Forum Nokia forum suggests that Nokia may be loosening the currently rather stringent requirements for publishing to Ovi: We are currently updating our platform to allow individual developers to publish in the Ovi Store. We apologize for the inconvenience. Please keep paying close attention to the Forum or other sources for Ovi Publish updates. Given the problems Nokia are facing with the “success” of their store compared with the iOS App Store and the Android Market, Nokia have to do something.

MeeGo open requirements process

maemo.org has used Bugzilla and Brainstorm to try and have an open specification process; but with so many plans being formed behind Nokia's closed doors, success for enhancement development was limited; usually because of incompatibilities with the "UI specification" for an application, or the lack of engagement of product managers. MeeGo, however, does have an open requirements gathering process, which was unveiled by Sami Pienimäki: As earlier published, an open Roadmapping will be run by the Working Groups of each category and the Core Program respectively. They are then working further with the public Feature Requests to turn them to Roadmap items and eventually to implementable engineering requirements. Based around Bugzilla, this should form the core of all the requirements gathering for MeeGo.

Hosting Maemo and MeeGo build systems together

David Greaves, Carsten Munk, Niels Breet and (your editor) Andrew Flegg have signed a joiend letter on behalf of the Maemo development community to push for the MeeGo and Maemo community build systems (running on OBS) to be co-located and co-managed: the benefits of supporting a smooth transition for the vibrant Maemo development community would be worthwhile both for MeeGo and Maemo: developers would be able to use the OBS' natural ability to target Fremantle, Harmattan and MeeGo from a single location. This would bring more developers and their applications to MeeGo sooner. [...] The potential hiccup is that most Maemo applications need some form of closed package in the autobuilder (at some level) from Nokia to build. MeeGo is supposed to be an open source project, so would this cause a conflict of interest? Fortunately, response from the MeeGo community has been wholly positive, with the numerous benefits outweighing any perceived downsides. Indeed, it might be that the signatories were worried more about the response than was necessary or, like most things, it could only cause problems once enacted.

MeeGo developer "buddy" system proposed

Robin Burchell has launched an initiative to ease the transition to MeeGo and Qt development for developers: We have a lot of highly productive developers that are not sure how their skills will remain relevant in a MeeGo context. We can't afford to lose them through neglect. There are also even more developers not familiar with MeeGo. When they find us, we have to grab them and keep them. Basically, we can't afford to lose our developers, and we need to gain more. I need help. I've written tutorials and helped a lot of people Those interested in mentoring new MeeGo developers should get in touch with Robin.

PyMaemo's guide to packaging Python applications without Scratchbox

The INdT team behind the continually successful Python port and frameworks have published a tool - and a guide - to building packages of Python applications on Linux, without the overhead of Scratchbox or MADDE. Their alternative is using stdeb, a set of extensions to distutils that allows generating Debian packages, both binary and source, that can be installed on the device or sent to the extras-devel repository. This tutorial will show how to integrate it into your project, build the packages and upload them to extras-devel. Unlike other solutions, such as py2deb, this builds the source necessary for uploading to the maemo.org Extras autobuilder and a binary package which can be directly tested on a device (or simulator).